“Everybody pretty much agrees that the relationship between elephants and people has dramatically changed,” [says psychologist Gay] Bradshaw. . . . “Where for centuries humans and elephants lived in relatively peaceful coexistence, there is now hostility and violence. Now, I use the term ‘violence’ because of the intentionality associated with it, both in the aggression of humans and, at times, the recently observed behavior of elephants.” . . .
Typically, elephant researchers have cited, as a cause of aggression, the high levels of testosterone in newly matured male elephants or the competition for land and resources between elephants and humans. But. . . Bradshaw and several colleagues argue. . . that today’s elephant populations are suffering from a form of chronic stress, a kind of specieswide trauma. Decades of poaching and culling and habitat loss, they claim, have so disrupted the intricate web of familial and societal relations by which young elephants have traditionally been raised in the wild, and by which established elephant herds are governed, that what we are now witnessing is nothing less than a precipitous collapse of elephant culture. . . .
Elephants, when left to their own devices, are profoundly social creatures. . . . Young elephants are raised within an extended, multitiered network of doting female caregivers that includes the birth mother, grandmothers, aunts and friends. These relations are maintained over a life span as long as 70 years. Studies of established herds have shown that young elephants stay within 15 feet of their mothers for nearly all of their first eight years of life, after which young females are socialized into the matriarchal network, while young males go off for a time into an allmale social group before coming back into the fold as mature adults. . . .
This fabric of elephant society, Bradshaw and her colleagues [demonstrate], ha[s] effectively been frayed by years of habitat loss and poaching, along with systematic culling by government agencies to control elephant numbers and translocations of herds to different habitats. . . . As a result of such social upheaval, calves are now being born to and raised by ever younger and inexperienced mothers. Young orphaned elephants, meanwhile, that have witnessed the death of a parent at the hands of poachers are coming of age in the absence of the support system that defines traditional elephant life. “The loss of elephant elders,” [says] Bradshaw . . . "and the traumatic experience of witnessing the massacres of their family, impairs normal brain and behavior development in young elephants.”
What Bradshaw and her colleagues describe would seem to be an extreme form of anthropocentric conjecture if the evidence that they’ve compiled from various elephant researchers. . . weren’t so compelling. The elephants of decimated herds, especially orphans who’ve watched the death of their parents and elders from poaching and culling, exhibit behavior typically associated with posttraumatic stress disorder and other traumarelated disorders in humans: abnormal startle response, unpredictable asocial behavior, inattentive mothering and hyperaggression. . . .
[According to Bradshaw], “Elephants are suffering and behaving in the same ways that we recognize in ourselves as a result of violence. . . . Except perhaps for a few specific features, brain organization and early development of elephants and humans are extremely similar.”
 The passage makes all of the following claims EXCEPT:
 elephant mothers are evolving newer ways of rearing their calves to adapt to emerging threats.
 the elephant response to deeply disturbing experiences is similar to that of humans.
 human actions such as poaching and culling have created stressful conditions for elephant communities.
 elephants establish extended and enduring familial relationships as do humans.
The second choice can be seen in the last sentence of the second last paragraph: ?the elephants of decimated herds, especially orphans who?ve watched the death of their parents and elders from poaching and culling, exhibit behavior typically associated with?. humans?
Again, the evidence for choice 2 can been found in the second last paragraph; anthropocentric means concerning humans or brought by/caused by humans. Thus both options 2 and 3 can be safely eliminated.
The clue to the choice 4 can be found in the third paragraph, which says that elephants are profoundly social creatures. For option 1 we have no evidence.
 Which of the following statements best expresses the overall argument of this passage?
 Recent elephant behaviour could be understood as a form of specieswide traumarelated response.
 Elephants, like the humans they are in conflict with, are profoundly social creatures.
 The relationship between elephants and humans has changed from one of coexistence to one of hostility.
 The brain organisation and early development of elephants and humans are extremely similar.
This question is just another way of asking the central idea of the question. Here we have been asked to express the overall argument of the passage.
Though option 4 is visible in the paragraph, it is not the central idea. The central idea seems to be focusing on the change in the elephants? attitude towards humans. Option 1 captures the key argument of the passage.
Like option 4, option 2, though true as per the passage, is not the key focus of the passage.
Option 3 might look like a good choice, but there is a flaw in the option. The passage is not focusing on the relationship between elephants and humans, though the passage starts on that note. The author is more focused on bringing to our attention the aggressive behavior of elephants and tries to find out the causes of that aggression.
Option 1 is the best choice because bulk of the passage is dedicated to how and why the elephants behave aggressively (specieswidetraumarelated response)
 Which of the following measures is Bradshaw most likely to support to address the problem of elephant aggression?
 Funding of more studies to better understand the impact of testosterone on male elephant aggression.
 The development of treatment programmes for elephants drawing on insights gained from treating posttraumatic stress disorder in humans.
 Studying the impact of isolating elephant calves on their early brain development, behaviour and aggression.
 Increased funding for research into the similarity of humans and other animals drawing on insights gained from humanelephant similarities.
To answer this question, we must first carefully read the question. The question wants us to address the problem of aggression in elephants, suggesting that we must pick the option that brings a solution to the problem of elephant aggression.
Option 1 goes out because the testosterone issue is not at all a concern or the bone of contention. Moreover, by understanding it, how would we be able to address the problem concerning elephant aggression.
Option 2 could indeed help us address the problem of elephant aggression because the trauma experienced by elephants is very similar to stress disorder in humans, and because elephants are social creatures just as humans are, insights gained from treating posttraumatic stress disorder in humans might help us address the problem of elephant aggression. Option 2 is the right choice
Both option 3 and 4 are not likely to contribute in any ways to addressing the problem of elephant aggression. If yes, then there must a strong evidence for that in the passage, but we have no such evidence.
 In paragraph 4, the phrase, “The fabric of elephant society . . . has(s) effectively been frayed by . . .” is:
 an accurate description of the condition of elephant herds today.
 a metaphor for the effect of human activity on elephant communities.
 an exaggeration aimed at bolstering Bradshaw’s claims.
 an ode to the fragility of elephant society today.
The fabric has been frayed is a figurative expression in which the elephant society has been compared to a fabric that humans have frayed. Choice 2, by stating that it is a metaphor, properly captures the essence of the statement.
Option 1 is incorrect because the statement is not a description but an assertion of a condition that exists today.
Both option 3 and 4 are not in tune with the author?s purpose. The author is not exaggerating the disintegration of elephant society. He is, in fact, being quite sympathetic.
Option 4 suggests that the society has become frail on its own, without any external cause. But human activity is the cause and that has frayed the fabric. Thus, option 4 too is not correctly expressing the idea given in the question.
 In the first paragraph, Bradshaw uses the term “violence” to describe the recent change in the humanelephant relationship because, according to him:
 there is a purposefulness in human and elephant aggression towards each other.
 elephant herds and their habitat have been systematically destroyed by humans.
 humanelephant interactions have changed their character over time.
 both humans and elephants have killed members of each other’s species.
The hint to the right answer is there in the first para. The author says that there is intentionality associated with the word ?violence?, suggesting that there is a reason behind human and elephant aggression towards each other. Option 1 is thus the right choice.
Option 2 says ?systematically destroyed?. There is no evidence of ?systematic destruction? of elephant herds by humans. It is an extreme choice.
Option 3 is true as per the passage, but that is not the reason behind the author?s using the term ?violence? to describe the recent change in the humanelephant relationship.
Option 4 is incorrect but the author is focusing on elephants? aggression towards humans, something that should not be necessarily interpreted as ?killing?
The only thing worse than being lied to is not knowing you’re being lied to. It’s true that plastic pollution is a huge problem, of planetary proportions. And it’s true we could all dwvg o more to reduce our plastic footprint. The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it.
Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper. You struggle to find a place to do it and feel pleased when you succeed. But your effort is wholly inadequate and distracts from the real problem of why the building is collapsing in the first place. The real problem is that singleuse plastic—the very idea of producing plastic items like grocery bags, which we use for an average of 12 minutes but can persist in the environment for half a millennium—is an incredibly reckless abuse of technology. Encouraging individuals to recycle more will never solve the problem of a massive production of singleuse plastic that should have been avoided in the first place.
As an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, I have had a disturbing window into the accumulating literature on the hazards of plastic pollution. Scientists have long recognized that plastics biodegrade slowly, if at all, and pose multiple threats to wildlife through entanglement and consumption. More recent reports highlight dangers posed by absorption of toxic chemicals in the water and by plastic odors that mimic some species’ natural food. Plastics also accumulate up the food chain, and studies now show that we are likely ingesting it ourselves in seafood. . . .
Beginning in the 1950s, big beverage companies like CocaCola and AnheuserBusch, along with Phillip Morris and others, formed a nonprofit called Keep America Beautiful. Its mission is/was to educate and encourage environmental stewardship in the public. . . . At face value, these efforts seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the role that corporate polluters play in the plastic problem. This clever misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep America Beautiful as the first corporate greenwashing front, as it has helped shift the public focus to consumer recycling behavior and actively thwarted legislation that would increase extended producer responsibility for waste management. . . . [T]he greatest success of Keep America Beautiful has been to shift the onus of environmental responsibility onto the public while simultaneously becoming a trusted name in the environmental movement. . . .
So what can we do to make responsible use of plastic a reality? First: reject the lie. Litterbugs are not responsible for the global ecological disaster of plastic. Humans can only function to the best of their abilities, given time, mental bandwidth and systemic constraints. Our huge problem with plastic is the result of a permissive legal framework that has allowed the uncontrolled rise of plastic pollution, despite clear evidence of the harm it causes to local communities and the world’s oceans. Recycling is also too hard in most parts of the U.S. and lacks the proper incentives to make it work well.
 In the second paragraph, the phrase “what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper” means:
 relying on emerging technologies to mitigate the illeffects of plastic pollution.
 encouraging the responsible production of plastics by firms.
 focusing on consumer behaviour to tackle the problem of plastics pollution.
 focusing on singleuse plastic bags to reduce the plastics footprint.
The clue to the right answer is given in the last sentence of the first para and first sentence of the second para. The last sentence of the first para says ?the lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it.? The author suggests that changing consumer habits may not be a solution to the problem.
He further adds in the second para ?Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper?. He suggests that neither recycling nor change in consumer behavior is going to solve the problem. The right answer is 3
 In the first paragraph, the author uses “lie” to refer to the:
 blame assigned to consumers for indiscriminate use of plastics.
 understatement of the enormity of the plastics pollution problem.
 understatement of the effects of recycling plastics.
 fact that people do not know they have been lied to.
The answer to this question can be directly found in the passage. The author has used the word ?lie? in the first para. He says ?The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it?. The first part gives us the answer: the lie is the blame for the plastic problem is consumers. Thus, option 1 is the right choice. Since, the answer is directly stated and we have got the right choice, there is no point in disproving the others.
 The author lists all of the following as negative effects of the use of plastics EXCEPT the:
 slow pace of degradation or nondegradation of plastics in the environment.
 air pollution caused during the process of recycling plastics.
 adverse impacts on the digestive systems of animals exposed to plastic.
 poisonous chemicals released into the water and food we consume.
This is one of the simplest questions in this paper. You have to search the options and you will find the right answer. Except for the air pollution effect, everything is given in the passage. Thus option 2 is the right choice.
 Which of the following interventions would the author most strongly support:
 completely banning all singleuse plastic bags.
 having all consumers change their plastic consumption habits.
 recycling all plastic debris in the seabed.
 passing regulations targeted at producers that generate plastic products.
The clue to the right answer can be found in the last sentence of the paragraph. Right from the start the author says that there is no point in blaming consumers and in recycling plastics. The problem is likely to persist until we change the legal framework. The last part of the para says ?Our huge problem with plastic is the result of a permissive legal framework that has allowed the uncontrolled rise of plastic pollution, despite clear evidence of the harm it causes to local communities and the world?s oceans.?
If we pass regulations targeted at producers of plastics, we might be able to change the situation. Thus option 4 is the right choice.
 It can be inferred that the author considers the Keep America Beautiful organisation:
 an innovative example of a collaborative corporate social responsibility initiative.
 a sham as it diverted attention away from the role of corporates in plastics pollution.
 an important step in sensitising producers to the need to tackle plastics pollution.
 a "greenwash" because it was a benevolent attempt to improve public recycling habits.
The authors opinion about Keep America Beautiful can be found in the following lines in the second last paragraph of the passage: This clever misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep America Beautiful as the first corporate greenwashing front, as it has helped shift the public focus to consumer recycling behavior and actively thwarted legislation?. From this sentence we can infer that the author believes that Keep America Beautiful diverted people?s attention away from the role of corporates in plastic pollution.
Economists have spent most of the 20th century ignoring psychology, positive or otherwise. But today there is a great deal of emphasis on how happiness can shape global economies, or — on a smaller scale — successful business practice. This is driven, in part, by a trend in "measuring" positive emotions, mostly so they can be optimized. Neuroscientists, for example, claim to be able to locate specific emotions, such as happiness or disappointment, in particular areas of the brain. Wearable technologies, such as Spire, offer datadriven advice on how to reduce stress.
We are no longer just dealing with "happiness" in a philosophical or romantic sense — it has become something that can be monitored and measured, including by our behavior, use of social media and bodily indicators such as pulse rate and facial expressions.
There is nothing automatically sinister about this trend. But it is disquieting that the businesses and experts driving the quantification of happiness claim to have our best interests at heart, often concealing their own agendas in the process. In the workplace, happy workers are viewed as a "winwin." Work becomes more pleasant, and employees, more productive. But this is now being pursued through the use of performanceevaluating wearable technology, such as Humanyze or Virgin Pulse, both of which monitor physical signs of stress and activity toward the goal of increasing productivity.
Cities such as Dubai, which has pledged to become the "happiest city in the world," dream up evermore elaborate and intrusive ways of collecting data on wellbeing — to the point where there is now talk of using CCTV cameras to monitor facial expressions in public spaces. New ways of detecting emotions are hitting the market all the time: One company, Beyond Verbal, aims to calculate moods conveyed in a phone conversation, potentially without the knowledge of at least one of the participants. And Facebook [has] demonstrated . . . that it could influence our emotions through tweaking our news feeds — opening the door to evermore targeted manipulation in advertising and influence.
As the science grows more sophisticated and technologies become more intimate with our thoughts and bodies, a clear trend is emerging. Where happiness indicators were once used as a basis to reform society, challenging the obsession with money that G.D.P. measurement entrenches, they are increasingly used as a basis to transform or discipline individuals.
Happiness becomes a personal project, that each of us must now work on, like going to the gym. Since the 1970s, depression has come to be viewed as a cognitive or neurological defect in the individual, and never a consequence of circumstances. All of this simply escalates the sense of responsibility each of us feels for our own feelings, and with it, the sense of failure when things go badly. A society that deliberately removed certain sources of misery, such as precarious and exploitative employment, may well be a happier one. But we won't get there by making this single, often fleeting emotion, the overarching goal.
 In the author’s opinion, the shift in thinking in the 1970s:
 introduced greater stress into people’s lives as they were expected to be responsible for their own happiness.
 was a welcome change from the earlier view that depression could be cured by changing circumstances.
 put people in touch with their own feelings rather than depending on psychologists.
 reflected the emergence of neuroscience as the authority on human emotions.
This is a very good question. We must touch the right area of the passage to arrive at the answer. The clue to the answer lies in the last paragraph, which says ?Since the 1970s, depression has come to be viewed as a cognitive or neurological defect in the individual, and never a consequence of circumstances. All of this simply escalates the sense of responsibility each of us feels for our own feelings, and with it, the sense of failure when things go badly.?
The author suggests that before 1970 people thought that depression was a result of one?s circumstances. Option b is incorrect, as it speaks about how depression could be cured, while the passage has nothing about it.
As the second part of the extract suggests, people, after 1970, became more responsible towards their happiness, as it became clear that depression was not a result of circumstances but of neurological or cognitive defects.
Option 1 is the best choice.
 The author’s view would be undermined by which of the following research findings?
 There is a definitive move towards the adoption of wearable technology that taps into emotions.
 A proliferation of gyms that are collecting data on customer wellbeing.
 Individuals worldwide are utilising technologies to monitor and increase their wellbeing.
 Stakeholders globally are moving away from collecting data on the wellbeing of individuals.
This is a slightly tricky question. To answer this question correctly, we have to correctly identify the author?s argument or view. The author?s views can be found in many parts of the passage. The author?s views are clearly expressed in the second paragraph:
As the science grows more sophisticated and technologies become more intimate with our thoughts and bodies, a clear trend is emerging. Where happiness indicators were once used as a basis to reform society, challenging the obsession with money that G.D.P. measurement entrenches, they are increasingly used as a basis to transform or discipline individuals.
The author in the last sentence says that happiness indicators are used as a basis to transform or discipline individuals. Option 4 clearly weakens the author?s argument by saying that stakeholders are moving away from collecting data on the wellbeing of individuals. Thus, option 4 is undermining or weakening the author?s argument.
All the other three choices are supportive of the author?s views given in the paragraph.
 According to the author, Dubai:
 develops sophisticated technologies to monitor its inhabitants’ states of mind.
 incentivises companies that prioritise worker welfare.
 collaborates with Facebook to selectively influence its inhabitants’ moods.
 is on its way to becoming one of the world’s happiest cities.
Option 1 is clearly stated in the second paragraph of the passage. The second para says:
Cities such as Dubai, which has pledged to become the "happiest city in the world," dream up evermore elaborate and intrusive ways of collecting data on wellbeing ? to the point where there is now talk of using CCTV cameras to monitor facial expressions in public spaces?
Thus, option 1 is the right choice. There is no evidence for option 2 and 3, while option 4 says that it is on its way to becoming one of the world?s happiest cities. However, the passage says that Dubai wants to become. It doesn?t mean that it is likely to become the happiest city in the world.
 According to the author, wearable technologies and social media are contributing most to:
 happiness as a “personal project”.
 disciplining individuals to be happy.
 depression as a thing of the past.
 making individuals aware of stress in their lives.
The clue to the right answer is in the first paragraph; towards the end the author says that wearable devices are helping us to reduce stress. In other words, they are disciplining individuals to be happy. Option 3 is not so good a choice because though it is trying to make us happy, it does not say that it will entirely overcome depression in individuals. Option 3 is too extreme an interpretation of what is given in the passage.
 From the passage we can infer that the author would like economists to:
 correlate measurements of happiness with economic indicators.
 measure the effectiveness of Facebook and social media advertising.
 incorporate psychological findings into their research cautiously.
 work closely with neuroscientists to understand human behaviour.
The clue to the right answer is given in the very first sentence of the passage. The author right at the start says that economists have ignored psychology. From this we can infer that he would like economists to incorporate psychological findings in their research work. Option 3 becomes the right choice.
When researchers at Emory University in Atlanta trained mice to fear the smell of almonds (by pairing it with electric shocks), they found, to their consternation, that both the children and grandchildren of these mice were spontaneously afraid of the same smell. That is not supposed to happen. Generations of schoolchildren have been taught that the inheritance of acquired characteristics is impossible. A mouse should not be born with something its parents have learned during their lifetimes, any more than a mouse that loses its tail in an accident should give birth to tailless mice. . . .
Modern evolutionary biology dates back to a synthesis that emerged around the 1940s60s, which married Charles Darwin’s mechanism of natural selection with Gregor Mendel’s discoveries of how genes are inherited. The traditional, and still dominant, view is that adaptations – from the human brain to the peacock’s tail – are fully and satisfactorily explained by natural selection (and subsequent inheritance). Yet [new evidence] from genomics, epigenetics and developmental biology [indicates] that evolution is more complex than we once assumed. . . .
In his book On Human Nature (1978), the evolutionary biologist Edward O Wilson claimed that human culture is held on a genetic leash. The metaphor [needs revision]. . . . Imagine a dogwalker (the genes) struggling to retain control of a brawny mastiff (human culture). The pair’s trajectory (the pathway of evolution) reflects the outcome of the struggle. Now imagine the same dogwalker struggling with multiple dogs, on leashes of varied lengths, with each dog tugging in different directions. All these tugs represent the influence of developmental factors, including epigenetics, antibodies and hormones passed on by parents, as well as the ecological legacies and culture they bequeath. . . .
The received wisdom is that parental experiences can’t affect the characters of their offspring. Except they do. The way that genes are expressed to produce an organism’s phenotype – the actual characteristics it ends up with – is affected by chemicals that attach to them. Everything from diet to air pollution to parental behaviour can influence the addition or removal of these chemical marks, which switches genes on or off. Usually these socalled ‘epigenetic’ attachments are removed during the production of sperm and eggs cells, but it turns out that some escape the resetting process and are passed on to the next generation, along with the genes. This is known as ‘epigenetic inheritance’, and more and more studies are confirming that it really happens. Let’s return to the almondfearing mice. The inheritance of an epigenetic mark transmitted in the sperm is what led the mice’s offspring to acquire an inherited fear. . . .
Epigenetics is only part of the story. Through culture and society, [humans and other animals] inherit knowledge and skills acquired by [their] parents. . . . All this complexity . . . points to an evolutionary process in which genomes (over hundreds to thousands of generations), epigenetic modifications and inherited cultural factors (over several, perhaps tens or hundreds of generations), and parental effects (over singlegeneration timespans) collectively inform how organisms adapt. These extragenetic kinds of inheritance give organisms the flexibility to make rapid adjustments to environmental challenges, dragging genetic change in their wake – much like a rowdy pack of dogs.
 The Emory University experiment with mice points to the inheritance of:
 psychological markers
 acquired characteristics
 personality traits
 acquired parental fears
This is a very easy question and right at the start of the passage the clue to the right answer can be found. The passage says ?a mouse should not be born with something that its parents have learned during their lifetime?. Thus the author suggests that they should not have been born with acquired characteristics during their lifetime. We should not be tempted with option 4 because though it looks good, it is not the right choice. Fear is just one characteristics that is likely to be inherited, while the passage points at a broader conclusion that can be derived from this experiment. So the inheritance may not necessarily be of fears, but of anything that the parents might have acquired in their lifetime.
 Which of the following best describes the author's argument?
 Darwin’s and Mendel’s theories together best explain evolution.
 Mendel’s theory of inheritance is unfairly underestimated in explaining evolution.
 Wilson’s theory of evolution is scientifically superior to either Darwin’s or Mendel’s.
 Darwin’s theory of natural selection cannot fully explain evolution.
The hint to the right answer can be found in the second paragraph of the passage. The second para says: The traditional, and still dominant, view is that adaptations ? from the human brain to the peacock?s tail ? are fully and satisfactorily explained by natural selection (and subsequent inheritance). Yet [new evidence] from genomics, epigenetics and developmental biology [indicates] that evolution is more complex than we once assumed. .
Thus 4 is the best choice, as the author attributes inheritance to much more than natural selection and mendelian gentics. The other negative opinions expressed in the other options cannot be seen anywhere in the passage.
 Which of the following, if found to be true, would negate the main message of the passage?
 A study affirming the influence of sociocultural markers on evolutionary processes.
 A study highlighting the criticality of epigenetic inheritance to evolution.
 A study indicating the primacy of ecological impact on human adaptation.
 A study affirming the sole influence of natural selection and inheritance on evolution.
To answer this question correctly, we have to understand the main message of the passage. The main idea is that there is a lot more to inheritance than just natural selection and genetics. So if there is a study that affirms the sole influence of natural selection and inheritance on evolution than the author?s main argument would be weakened.
We can see clear evidence in these lines: All these tugs represent the influence of developmental factors, including epigenetics, antibodies and hormones passed on by parents, as well as the ecological legacies and culture they bequeath.
 The passage uses the metaphor of a dog walker to argue that evolutionary adaptation is most comprehensively understood as being determined by:
 extra genetic, genetic, epigenetic and genomic legacies.
 sociocultural, genetic, epigenetic, and genomic legacies
 ecological, hormonal, extra genetic and genetic legacies.
 genetic, epigenetic, developmental factors, and ecological legacies.
This too is an easy question, the clue to the right answer can be seen here in these lines:
We can see clear evidence in these lines: All these tugs represent the influence of developmental factors, including epigenetics, antibodies and hormones passed on by parents, as well as the ecological legacies and culture they bequeath.
The] Indian government [has] announced an international competition to design a National War Memorial in New Delhi, to honour all of the Indian soldiers who served in the various wars and counterinsurgency campaigns from 1947 onwards. The terms of the competition also specified that the new structure would be built adjacent to the India Gate – a memorial to the Indian soldiers who died in the First World War. Between the old imperialist memorial and the proposed nationalist one, India’s contribution to the Second World War is airbrushed out of existence.
The Indian government’s conception of the war memorial was not merely absentminded. Rather, it accurately reflected the fact that both academic history and popular memory have yet to come to terms with India’s Second World War, which continues to be seen as little more than mood music in the drama of India’s advance towards independence and partition in 1947. Further, the political trajectory of the postwar subcontinent has militated against popular remembrance of the war. With partition and the onset of the IndiaPakistan rivalry, both of the new nations needed fresh stories for selflegitimisation rather than focusing on shared wartime experiences.
However, the Second World War played a crucial role in both the independence and partition of India. . . . The Indian army recruited, trained and deployed some 2.5 million men, almost 90,000 of which were killed and many more injured. Even at the time, it was recognised as the largest volunteer force in the war. . . .
India’s material and financial contribution to the war was equally significant. India emerged as a major militaryindustrial and logistical base for Allied operations in southeast Asia and the Middle East. This led the United States to take considerable interest in the country’s future, and ensured that this was no longer the preserve of the British government.
Other wartime developments pointed in the direction of India’s independence. In a stunning reversal of its longstanding financial relationship with Britain, India finished the war as one of the largest creditors to the imperial power.
Such extraordinary mobilization for war was achieved at great human cost, with the Bengal famine the most extreme manifestation of widespread wartime deprivation. The costs on India’s home front must be counted in millions of lives.
Indians signed up to serve on the war and home fronts for a variety of reasons. . . . [M]any were convinced that their contribution would open the doors to India’s freedom. . . . The political and social churn triggered by the war was evident in the massive waves of popular protest and unrest that washed over rural and urban India in the aftermath of the conflict. This turmoil was crucial in persuading the Attlee government to rid itself of the incubus of ruling India. . . .
Seventy years on, it is time that India engaged with the complex legacies of the Second World War. Bringing the war into the ambit of the new national memorial would be a fitting – if not overdue – recognition that this was India’s War.
 In the first paragraph, the author laments the fact that:
 there is no recognition of the Indian soldiers who served in the Second World War.
 the new war memorial will be built right next to India Gate.
 India lost thousands of human lives during the Second World War.
 funds will be wasted on another war memorial when we already have the India Gate memorial.
The clue to the right answer is there right in the first paragraph. The author says: Between the old imperialist memorial and the proposed nationalist one, India?s contribution to the Second World War is airbrushed out of existence.
The phrase ?airbrushed out of existence? has that regret in the tone. Thus 1 is the right choice.
 The phrase “mood music” is used in the second paragraph to indicate that the Second World War is viewed as:
 setting the stage for the emergence of the India–Pakistan rivalry in the subcontinent.
 a tragic period in terms of loss of lives and national wealth.
 a backdrop to the subsequent independence and partition of the region.
 a part of the narrative on the illeffects of colonial rule on India.
Passage Overview: In the passage the author seems to be stressing on ?India?s contribution to the second world war, and its consequences, something which has been ignored both by academicians and the Indian government?
This question is a kind of interpretation question. If we don?t know the meaning of the phrase ?mood music?, we must try to the see the context in which it has been used. By the way, ?mood music? is recorded music that is played in the background to make the audience relax. So if you know the meaning, you can straightaway mark 3 as the answer. A backdrop is a background just as mood music is played in the background. Even from the passage it is clear that to the Indian government and Indian academicians, India?s contribution to the second world war is just a little more than a mood music, in other words it is not a significant contribution, something that the author seems to be lamenting. Option 3 is the right choice.
 The author lists all of the following as outcomes of the Second World War EXCEPT:
 independence of the subcontinent and its partition into two countries.
 US recognition of India’s strategic location and role in the War.
 largescale deaths in Bengal as a result of deprivation and famine.
 the large financial debt India owed to Britain after the War.
This is a factual question whose answer depends on how well you are able to find the information scattered in the passage. The first outcome is stated in the first sentence of the third paragraph where the author says that ?India?s contribution played a significant role in India?s independence and partition?. So, since option 1 is given, it is not the right answer. Option 2 is given in the fourth paragraph. Option 3 is stated in the third last paragraph. Thus, option 4 is the right choice.
We could have marked option 4 directly, as it is stating exactly opposite of what is given in the passage. It was not India but Britain that owed large financial debt. India was one of the biggest creditors to Britain, the passage says. This means that it was India had lent resources to Britain.
 The author claims that omitting mention of Indians who served in the Second World War from the new National War Memorial is:
 a reflection of the academic and popular view of India’s role in the War.
 appropriate as their names can always be included in the India Gate memorial.
 a reflection of misplaced priorities of the postindependence Indian governments.
 is something which can be rectified in future by constructing a separate memorial.
This is a very easy question, as the clue to the right answer is directly visible in the passage. The first sentence of the second paragraph says that the ?omission was not absentminded, suggesting that it was deliberate. He further adds that the omission ?accurately reflected the fact that both academic history and popular memory have yet to come to terms with India?s Second World War?. The other choices are neither stated nor implied in the paragraph.
.
 The author suggests that a major reason why India has not so far acknowledged its role in the Second World War is that it:
 blames the War for leading to the momentous partition of the country.
 wants to forget the human and financial toll of the War on the country.
 has been focused on building an independent, noncolonial political identity.
 views the War as a predominantly Allied effort, with India playing only a supporting role.
This is a slightly difficult question, but can be solved by the process of elimination. Though the passage nowhere directly states the reason why India has not so far acknowledged its role in the Second World War, the hint is there in the second paragraph.
The last sentence of the second paragraph says: With partition and the onset of the IndiaPakistan rivalry, both of the new nations needed fresh stories for selflegitimization rather than focusing on shared wartime experiences. ?Selflegitimization? would mean selfassertion, or establishing oneself as a strong legal entity. This makes option 3 the right choice. Moreover, none of the other options have any hint in the paragraph. Option 1 and 4 go out because the author asserts that India did make a significant contribution to the war. Option might seem a tempting choice, but there is no hint for it.
 The four sentences (labelled 1,2,3,4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labelled with a number. Decide on the proper sequence of order of the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer:
 Impartiality and objectivity are fiendishly difficult concepts that can cause all sorts of injustices even if transparently implemented.
 It encourages us into bubbles of people we know and like, while blinding us to different perspectives, but the deeper problem of ‘transparency’ lies in the words “…and much more”.
 Twitter’s website says that “tweets you are likely to care about most will show up first in your timeline…based on accounts you interact with most, tweets you engage with, and much more.”
 We are only told some of the basic principles, and we can’t see the algorithm itself, making it hard for citizens to analyse the system sensibly or fairly or be convinced of its impartiality and objectivity.
 Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Choose its number as your answer and key it in.
 Translators are like bumblebees.
 Though long since scientifically disproved, this factoid is still routinely trotted out.
 Similar pronouncements about the impossibility of translation have dogged practitioners since Leonardo Bruni’s De interpretatione recta, published in 1424.
 Bees, unaware of these deliberations, have continued to flit from flower to flower, and translators continue to translate.
 In 1934, the French entomologist August Magnan pronounced the flight of the bumblebee to be aerodynamically impossible
 The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
 The woodland’s canopy receives most of the sunlight that falls on the trees.
 Swifts do not confine themselves to woodlands, but hunt wherever there are insects in the air.
 With their streamlined bodies, swifts are agile flyers, ideally adapted to twisting and turning through the air as they chase flying insects – the creatures that form their staple diet.
 Hundreds of thousands of insects fly in the sunshine up above the canopy, some falling prey to swifts and swallows

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.
Production and legitimation of scientific knowledge can be approached from a number of perspectives. To study knowledge production from the sociology of professions perspective would mean a focus on the institutionalization of a body of knowledge. The professionsapproach informed earlier research on managerial occupation, business schools and management knowledge. It however tends to reify institutional power structures in its understanding of the links between knowledge and authority. Knowledge production is restricted in the perspective to the selected members of the professional community, most notably to the university faculties and professional colleges. Power is understood as a negative mechanism, which prevents the nonprofessional actors from offering their ideas and information as legitimate knowledge.
 Professionsapproach aims at the institutionalization of knowledge but restricts knowledge production as a function of a select few.
 The study of knowledge production can be done through many perspectives.
 Professionsapproach focuses on the creation of institutions of higher education and disciplines to promote knowledge production
 The professionsapproach has been one of the most relied upon perspective in the study of management knowledge production.
The above simplification helps us arrive at option 1 as the right choice. Options 3 and 4 are against the author’s stand in the passage. Option 2 is not the core message, but an inference that can be derived from the above passage.

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.
Artificial embryo twinning is a relatively lowtech way to make clones. As the name suggests, this technique mimics the natural process that creates identical twins. In nature, twins form very early in development when the embryo splits in two. Twinning happens in the first days after egg and sperm join, while the embryo is made of just a small number of unspecialized cells. Each half of the embryo continues dividing on its own, ultimately developing into separate, complete individuals. Since they developed from the same fertilized egg, the resulting individuals are genetically identical.
 Artificial embryo twinning is lowtech and mimetic of the natural development of genetically identical twins from the embryo after fertilization.
 Artificial embryo twinning is lowtech unlike the natural development of identical twins from the embryo after fertilization.
 Artificial embryo twinning is just like the natural development of twins, where during fertilization twins are formed.
 Artificial embryo twinning is lowtech and is close to the natural development of twins where the embryo splits into two identical twins.

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.
The conceptualization of landscape as a geometric object first occurred in Europe and is historically related to the European conceptualization of the organism, particularly the human body, as a geometric object with parts having a rational, threedimensional organization and integration. The European idea of landscape appeared before the science of landscape emerged, and it is no coincidence that Renaissance artists such as Leonardo da Vinci, who studied the structure of the human body, also facilitated an understanding of the structure of landscape. Landscape which had been a subordinate background to religious or historical narratives, became an independent genre or subject of art by the end of sixteenth century or the beginning of the seventeenth century.
 Landscape became a major subject of art at the turn of the sixteenth century.
 The threedimensional understanding of the organism in Europe led to a similar approach towards the understanding of landscape.
 The study of landscape as an independent genre was aided by the Renaissance artists.
 The Renaissance artists were responsible for the study of landscape as a subject of art.
Option 2 too has some distortions; while the passage says that conceptualization of landscape as geometric object is related to the European conceptualization of the organism as a geometric object, the option says that threedimensional understanding of the organism led to a similar approach…. It should be geometric understanding of the organism.
Option 3 best captures the author’s position, which in the passage is clearly visible as “Renaissance artists also facilitated an understanding of the structure of landscape”.
Option 4 is incorrect because it distorts the fact by saying the Renaissance artists were responsible, while the passage says that they facilitated.
 The four sentences (labelled 1,2,3,4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labelled with a number. Decide on the proper sequence of order of the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer:
 But now we have another group: the unwitting enablers.
 Democracy and high levels of inequality of the kind that have come to characterize the United States are simply incompatible.
 Believing these people are working for a better world, they are, actually, at most, chipping away at the margins, making slight course corrections, ensuring the system goes on as it is, uninterrupted.
 Very rich people will always use money to maintain their political and economic power.
 Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out.
 In many cases time inconsistency is what prevents our going from intention to action.
 For people to continuously postpone getting their children immunized, they would need to be constantly fooled by themselves.
 In the specific case of immunization, however, it is hard to believe that time inconsistency by itself would be sufficient to make people permanently postpone the decision if they were fully cognizant of its benefits.
 In most cases, even a small cost of immunization was large enough to discourage most people.
 Not only do they have to think that they prefer to spend time going to the camp next month rather than today, they also have to believe that they will indeed go next month.
 Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out.
 Displacement in Bengal is thus not very significant in view of its magnitude.
 A factor of displacement in Bengal is the shifting course of the Ganges leading to erosion of river banks.
 The nature of displacement in Bengal makes it an interesting case study.
 Since displacement due to erosion is well spread over a long period of time, it remains invisible.
 Rapid displacement would have helped sensitize the public to its human costs.
 The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
 The eventual diagnosis was skin cancer and after treatment all seemed well.
 The viola player didn’t know what it was; nor did her GP.
 Then a routine scan showed it had come back and spread to her lungs.
 It started with a lump on Cathy Perkins’ index finger.
1600 satellites were sent up by a country for several purposes. The purposes are classified as broadcasting (B), communication (C), surveillance (S), and others (O). A satellite can serve multiple purposes; however a satellite serving either B, or C, or S does not serve O.
The following facts are known about the satellites:
1. The numbers of satellites serving B, C, and S (though may be not exclusively) are in the ratio 2:1:1.
2. The number of satellites serving all three of B, C, and S is 100.
3. The number of satellites exclusively serving C is the same as the number of satellites exclusively serving S. This number is 30% of the number of satellites exclusively serving B.
4. The number of satellites serving O is the same as the number of satellites serving both C and S but not B.
 What best can be said about the number of satellites serving C?
 Must be between 450 and 725
 Cannot be more than 800
 Must be between 400 and 800
 Must be at least 100
It is given that the satellites serving either B, C or S do not serve O.
From (1), let the number of satellites serving B, C and S be 2K, K, K respectively.
Let the number of satellites exclusively serving B be x.
From (3), the number of satellites exclusively serving C and exclusively serving S will each be 0.3x
From (4), the number of satellites serving O is same as the number of satellites serving only C and S. Let that number be y.
Since the number of satellites serving C is same as the number of satellites serving S, we can say that
(number of satellites serving only B and C) + 0.3x + 100 + y = (number of satellites serving only B and S) +
0.3x + 100 + y
Let the number of satellites serving only B and C = the number of satellites serving only B and S = Z
Therefore, the venn diagram will be as follows
Given that there are a total of 1600 satellites
=> x + z + 0.3x + z + 100 + y + 0.3x + y = 1600
1.6x + 2y + 2z = 1500  (1)
Also K = 0.3x + z + y +100
Satellites serving B = 2K = x + 2z + 100
=> 2(0.3x + z + y + 100) = x + 2z + 100
0.4x = 2y + 100
x = 5y + 250 (2)
Substituting (2) in (1), we will get
1.6 (5y + 250) + 2y + 2z = 1500
10y + 2z = 1100
Z = 550 – 5y  (3)
Question 1:
The number of satellites serving C = z + 0.3x + 100 + y
= (550 – 5y) + 0.3(5y + 250) + 100 + y = 725 – 2.5y
This number will be maximum when y is minimum.
Minimum value of y is 0.
Therefore, the maximum number of satellites serving C will be 725.
From ③, z = 550 – 5y
Since the number of satellites cannot be negative,
$z \geq 0 \Rightarrow 550  5 y \geq 0$
$y \leq 110$
Maximum value of y is 110.
When y = 110, the number of satellites serving C will be 725 – 2.5 × 110 = 450. This will be the minimum
number of satellites serving C.
The number of satellites serving C must be between 450 and 725.
Question 2:
From 2, the number of satellites serving B exclusively is x = 5y + 250
This is minimum when y is minimum.
Minimum value of y = 0.
The minimum number of satellites serving B exclusively = 5 × 0 + 250 = 250.
Question 3:
Given that at least 100 satellites serve 0; we can say in this case that y ≥ 100.
Number of satellites serving s = 0.3x + z +100 + y=725 – 2.5y
This is minimum when y is maximum, i.e. 110, (from③)
Minimum number of satellites serving = 725 – 2.5 ×100 = 450.
This is maximum when y is minimum, i.e., 100 in this case.
Maximum number of satellites serving = 725 – 2.5 ×100 = 475
Therefore, the number of satellites serving S is at most 475
Question 4:
The number of satellites serving at least two of B, C or S = number of satellites serving exactly two of
B, C or S + Number of satellites serving all the three
= z + z + y + 100
= 2(550 – 5y) + y + 100
= 1200 – 9y.
Given that this is equal to 1200
1200 – 9y = 1200
=> y = 0
If y = 0, x = 5y + 250 = 250
z = 550 – 5y = 550
No. of satellites serving C = k = z + 0.3x + 100 + y
= 550 + 0.3 250 + 100 + y
= 725
No. of satellites serving B = 2k = 2 725 = 1450.
From the given options, we can say that the option “the number of satellites serving C cannot be uniquely determined” must be FALSE
 What is the minimum possible number of satellites serving B exclusively?
 100
 200
 500
 250
 If at least 100 of the 1600 satellites were serving O, what can be said about the number of satellites serving S?
 At most 475
 Exactly 475
 At least 475
 No conclusion is possible based on the given information
 If the number of satellites serving at least two among B, C, and S is 1200, which of the following MUST be FALSE?
 The number of satellites serving C cannot be uniquely determined
 The number of satellites serving B is more than 1000
 All 1600 satellites serve B or C or S
 The number of satellites serving B exclusively is exactly 250
The multilayered piechart below shows the sales of LED television sets for a big retail electronics outlet during 2016 and 2017. The outer layer shows the monthly sales during this period, with each label showing the month followed by sales figure of that month. For some months, the sales figures are not given in the chart. The middlelayer shows quarterwise aggregate sales figures (in some cases, aggregate quarterwise sales numbers are not given next to the quarter). The innermost layer shows annual sales. It is known that the sales figures during the three months of the second quarter (April, May, June) of 2016 form an arithmetic progression, as do the three monthly sales figures in the fourth quarter (October, November, December) of that year.
 What is the percentage increase in sales in December 2017 as compared to the sales in December 2016?
 28.57
 22.22
 50.00
 38.46
It is given that the sales figures during the three months of the second quarter (April, May, June) of 2016 form an arithmetic progression.
So 40 + (40 + x) + (40 + 2x) = 150
Or x = 10
April 2016 = 40
May 2016 = 50
June 2016 = 60
Also, the same case holds for October, November, December of 2016.
100 + (100 + x) ++ (100 + 2x) = 360
Or x = 20
October 2016 = 100
November 2016 = 120
December 2016 = 140
Sales in December 2017 = 180
Sales in December 2016 = 140
Percentage increase $= \frac { 40 } { 140 } \times 100 = 28.57 \%$
So the percentage increase in the sales is highest for Q1
$\rightarrow \mathrm { Q } _ { 1 }$ of 2017$\mathrm { compared }$ with $\mathrm { Q } _ { 4 }$ of 2016
$= \frac { 380  360 } { 360 } \times 100 = 5.55 \%$ increase.
$\rightarrow \mathrm { Q } _ { 2 }$ of 2016$\mathrm { compared }$ with $\mathrm { Q } _ { 1 }$ of 2016
$= \frac { 150  240 } { 240 } \times 100 =  37.5 \%$ increase or 37.5$\%$ decrease
$\rightarrow \mathrm { Q } _ { 4 }$ of 2017 with compared with $\mathrm { Q } _ { 3 }$ of 2017
There is an increase from 220 to 500 .
$\rightarrow \mathrm { Q } _ { 2 }$ of 2017 with compared with $\mathrm { Q } _ { 1 }$ of 2017
$= \frac { 200  380 } { 380 } \times 100 =  47.36$ or 47.36$\%$ decrease
So, sales of $\mathrm { Q } _ { 2 }$ of $2017 ,$ had the highest percentage decrease compared with $\mathrm { Q } _ { 1 }$ of $2017 .$
 In which quarter of 2017 was the percentage increase in sales from the same quarter of 2016 the highest?
 Q1
 Q3
 Q4
 Q2
 During which quarter was the percentage decrease in sales from the previous quarter’s sales the highest?
 Q2 of 2017
 Q1 of 2017
 Q4 of 2017
 Q2 of 2016
 During which month was the percentage increase in sales from the previous month’s sales the highest?
 March of 2017
 October of 2017
 October of 2016
 March of 2016
An ATM dispenses exactly Rs. 5000 per withdrawal using 100, 200 and 500 rupee notes. The ATM requires every customer to give her preference for one of the three denominations of notes. It then dispenses notes such that the number of notes of the customer’s preferred denomination exceeds the total number of notes of other denominations dispensed to her.
 In how many different ways can the ATM serve a customer who gives 500 rupee notes as her preference?
Question 1:
The ATM dispenses only 500, 200 and 100 notes and since 500 rupee notes is the preference, it has to dispense more 500 rupee notes than the other two notes combined. The following ways are possible:
Hence, a total of seven ways are possible. Ans : 7
Question 2:
To serve the maximum number of customers with 500 rupee notes as preference, we need to minimize the number of 500 rupee notes that can be served to any person.
From the above solution, the minimum number of 500 rupee notes that the ATM can dispense to any person with 500 rupee notes as his/her preference is 8. Hence, with fifty 500 rupee notes, a total of 6 persons can be served. Ans : 6
Question 3:
Since there are a limited number of 500 rupee notes, we can minimize the number of 500 rupee notes dispensed to each customer, while ensuring that each customer is served at most 20 notes.
If no 500 rupee notes is dispensed, the minimum number of notes that must be dispensed is 25 (all 200 rupee notes). This is not possible.
If one 500 rupee note is dispensed, the minimum number of notes is 14 (one 500 rupee note, twelve 200 rupee notes and one 100 rupee note). This is also not possible.
If two 500 rupee notes are dispensed, the minimum number of notes is 22 (two 500 rupee notes and twenty 200 rupee notes).
If three 500 rupee notes are dispensed, the minimum number of notes is 21 (three 500 rupee notes, seventeen 200 rupee notes and one 100 rupee note). If four 500 rupee notes are dispensed, the minimum number of notes is 19 (four 500 rupee notes and fifteen 200 rupee notes). Hence, the minimum number of 500 rupee notes that can be dispensed to any person is 4. With fifty 500 rupee notes, a maximum of 12 persons can be served. Ans : 12
Question 4:
To dispense the smallest possible number of notes to a person with 500 rupee notes as his/her preference, the ATM should dispense all 500 rupee notes. Hence, minimum number of notes required to serve any person with 500 rupee notes as his/her preference = 10 (all of 500 rupees).
Total number of 500 rupee notes required to serve 50 customers with 500 rupee notes as his/her preference = 10 × 50 = 500
To minimize the number of notes to be served to a person with 100 rupee notes as his/her preference, we can maximize the number of 500 rupee notes served to him, keeping the 100 rupee notes more than the sum of the other two denominations.
This is possible if the machine serves eight 500 rupee notes and ten 100 rupee notes. Hence, the total number of 500 rupee notes required to serve 50 customers with 100 rupee notes as his/her preference = 8 × 50 = 400
Total number of 500 rupee notes required in the given scenario = 500 + 400 = 900 Ans : 900
Note: Given that the ATM dispenses 500, 200 and 100 rupee notes. A possible interpretation of this is that at least one note of each denomination is dispensed. However, as there is no additional information supporting this, you should also consider the cases in which not all the three denominations are dispensed.
 If the ATM could serve only 10 customers with a stock of fifty 500 rupee notes and a sufficient number of notes of other denominations, what is the maximum number of customers among these 10 who could have given 500 rupee notes as their preferences?
 What is the maximum number of customers that the ATM can serve with a stock of fifty 500 rupee notes and a sufficient number of notes of other denominations, if all the customers are to be served with at most 20 notes per withdrawal?
 10
 16
 12
 13
 What is the number of 500 rupee notes required to serve 50 customers with 500 rupee notes as their preferences and another 50 customers with 100 rupee notes as their preferences, if the total number of notes to be dispensed is the smallest possible?
 800
 750
 900
 1400
Adriana, Bandita, Chitra, and Daisy are four female students, and Amit, Barun, Chetan, and Deb are four male students. Each of them studies in one of three institutes  X, Y, and Z. Each student majors in one subject among Marketing, Operations, and Finance, and minors in a different one among these three subjects. The following facts are known about the eight students:
1. Three students are from X, three are from Y, and the remaining two students, both female, are from Z.
2. Both the male students from Y minor in Finance, while the female student from Y majors in Operations.
3. Only one male student majors in Operations, while three female students minor in Marketing.
4. One female and two male students major in Finance.
5. Adriana and Deb are from the same institute. Daisy and Amit are from the same institute.
6. Barun is from Y and majors in Operations. Chetan is from X and majors in Finance.
7. Daisy minors in Operations.
 Who are the students from the institute Z?
 Adriana and Bandita
 Adriana and Daisy
 Bandita and Chitra
 Chitra and Daisy
Daisy minors in operations (O) so other three must have minored in Finance (F). Let Adriana and Ded be from the some institute P. Daisy and Amit are from some institute q. So Bandita and Chitra must be from z as only two females are from z. Female student from y majors in operations so daisy cannot be from Y so daisy is from X so is Amit. So Adriana and Deb are form Y
Question 1:
Chitra and Bandita. Ans : Chitra and Bandita
Question 2:
Deb minors in Finance. Ans : Finance
Question 3:
Amit majors in finance. Ans : Finance
Question 4:
Given one female student majors in finance. If chitra majors in finance, Bandita majors in operations.
Ans : Operations
 Which subject does Deb minor in?
 Cannot be determined uniquely from the given information
 Marketing
 Operations
 Finance
 Which subject does Amit major in?
 Operations
 Marketing
 Cannot be determined uniquely from the given information
 Finance
 If Chitra majors in Finance, which subject does Bandita major in?
 Cannot be determined uniquely from the given information
 Marketing
 Finance
 Operations
You are given an n×n square matrix to be ?lled with numerals so that no two adjacent cells have the same numeral. Two cells are called adjacent if they touch each other horizontally, vertically or diagonally. So a cell in one of the four corners has three cells adjacent to it, and a cell in the ?rst or last row or column which is not in the corner has five cells adjacent to it. Any other cell has eight cells adjacent to it.
 What is the minimum number of different numerals needed to ?ll a 3×3 square matrix?
Given that n × n square matrix to be filled with numerals so that no two adjacent cells have the same numeral.
Also, two cells are called adjacent if they touch each other horizontally, vertically or diagonally.
As per the given definition, in the following matrix, the following are the cases of adjacent cells.
Question1:
As per the information, we’ve the following diagram for a 3 x 3 matrix to have minimum number of numerals.
So, we require 4 elements to have all different numerals. Ans : 4
Question 2:
As per the information, we’ve the following diagram for a 5 x 5 matrix to have minimum number of numerals.
So, we require 4 elements to have all different numerals. Ans : 4
Question 3:
Even if one mistake is allowed, then also there won’t be any change in the solution given above. Ans : 4
Question 4:
Given that all the cells adjacent to any particular cell must have different numerals, which is satisfied only
when there are at least 9 numerals. Ans : 9
 What is the minimum number of different numerals needed to ?ll a 5×5 square matrix?
 Suppose you are allowed to make one mistake, that is, one pair of adjacent cells can have the same numeral. What is the minimum number of different numerals required to ?ll a 5×5 matrix?
 16
 4
 25
 9
 Suppose that all the cells adjacent to any particular cell must have different numerals. What is the minimum number of different numerals needed to fill a 5×5 square matrix?
 9
 16
 4
 25
Fuel contamination levels at each of 20 petrol pumps P1, P2, …, P20 were recorded as either high, medium, or low.
1. Contamination levels at three pumps among P1 – P5 were recorded as high.
2. P6 was the only pump among P1 – P10 where the contamination level was recorded as low.
3. P7 and P8 were the only two consecutively numbered pumps where the same levels of contamination were recorded.
4. High contamination levels were not recorded at any of the pumps P16 – P20.
5. The number of pumps where high contamination levels were recorded was twice the number of pumps where low contamination levels were recorded.
 Which of the following MUST be true?
 The contamination level at P10 was recorded as high.
 The contamination level at P13 was recorded as low.
 The contamination level at P20 was recorded as medium.
 The contamination level at P12 was recorded as high.
According to 1 and 2, we get
Also, from 4, we get 2 cases:
From (5)
If total number of low (L) pipes = 3
number of high (H) pipes = 6
number of medium (M) pipes = 11
Also if number of low (L) pipes = 4
number of high (H) pipes = 8
number of medium (M) pipes = 8
P7 and P8 can be HH or MM
Therefore, two cases arise for P1 – P10
Combining (1) & (2), we get the following possible
cases for P1 – P 20
Case 1:
H M H M H L H H M H
M H M H M L M L M L
No. (L) = 4
No. (H) = 8
No. (M) = 8
Case 2:
H M H M H L H H M H
L M H M H M L M L M
No. (L) = 4,
No. (H) = 8,
and No. (M) = 8
Case 3:
H M H M H L H H M H
M L H M H M L M L M
No. (L) = 4
No. (H) = 8
No. (M) = 8
 What best can be said about the number of pumps at which the contamination levels were recorded as medium?
 Exactly 8
 More than 4
 At least 8
 At most 9
 If the contamination level at P11 was recorded as low, then which of the following MUST be true?
 The contamination level at P12 was recorded as high.
 The contamination level at P14 was recorded as medium.
 The contamination level at P15 was recorded as medium.
 The contamination level at P18 was recorded as low.
 If contamination level at P15 was recorded as medium, then which of the following MUST be FALSE?
 Contamination level at P14 was recorded to be higher than that at P15.
 Contamination levels at P10 and P14 were recorded as the same.
 Contamination levels at P13 and P17 were recorded as the same.
 Contamination levels at P11 and P16 were recorded as the same.
A company administers a written test comprising of three sections of 20 marks each – Data Interpretation (DI), Written English (WE) and General Awareness (GA), for recruitment. A composite score for a candidate (out of 80) is calculated by doubling her marks in DI and adding it to the sum of her marks in the other two sections. Candidates who score less than 70% marks in two or more sections are disqualified. From among the rest, the four with the highest composite scores are recruited. If four or less candidates qualify, all who qualify are recruited.
Ten candidates appeared for the written test. Their marks in the test are given in the table below. Some marks in the table are missing, but the following facts are known:
1. No two candidates had the same composite score.
2. Ajay was the unique highest scorer in WE.
3. Among the four recruited, Geeta had the lowest composite score.
4. Indu was recruited.
5. Danish, Harini, and Indu had scored the same marks the in GA.
6. Indu and Jatin both scored 100% in exactly one section and Jatin’s composite score was 10 more than Indu’s.
 Which of the following statements MUST be true?
1. Jatin's composite score was more than that of Danish.
2. Indu scored less than Chetna in DI.
3. Jatin scored more than Indu in GA.
 Only 2
 Only 1
 Both 1 and 2
 Both 2 and 3
Given, Indu was recruited and Indu scored 100% in exactly one section.
Jatin scored 100% in exactly one section
=> Jatin's scored are
Composite score = 20 x + 2 + 16 + 14 = 70
Indu's score is 70 – 10 =60
If Indu scores 20 in DI, Indus's score in GA = 60 – 40 – 8 = 12
In this case, Indu will not quality Hence, Indu scored 20 in GA.
$\Rightarrow$ score in $\mathrm { Dl } = \frac { 60  20  8 } { 2 } = \frac { 32 } { 2 } = 16$
$\Rightarrow$ Danish, Harini and Indu scored 20 in GA
Score of Danish is 2(8) + 15 + 20 = 51
Hence, Score of Ajay is 2(8) + 20 + 16 = 52
(As Ajay scores either 19 or 20 in DI, the composite score cannot be 51)
Question 1:
(Jatin's composite score was more than that of Danish) and (Indu scored less than Chetan in DI).
Ans : Both 1 and 2
Question 2:
If Bala scores 20 in DI, Score = 2(20) + 9 + 11 = 60, which is the same as that of Indu.
Not possible
Hence, Bala scored same as Jatin in DI must be false. Ans : Bala scored same as Jatin in DI
Question 3:
Ans: 13
Question 4:
Ans: 14
 Which of the following statements MUST be FALSE?
 Chetna scored more than Bala in DI
 Harini’s composite score was less than that of Falak
 Bala’s composite score was less than that of Ester
 Bala scored same as Jatin in DI
 If all the candidates except Ajay and Danish had different marks in DI, and Bala's composite score was less than Chetna's composite score, then what is the maximum marks that Bala could have scored in DI?
 If all the candidates scored different marks in WE then what is the maximum marks that Harini could have scored in WE?
Twenty four people are part of three committees which are to look at research, teaching, and administration respectively. No two committees have any member in common. No two committees are of the same size. Each committee has three types of people: bureaucrats, educationalists, and politicians, with at least one from each of the three types in each committee. The following facts are also known about the committees:
1. The numbers of bureaucrats in the research and teaching committees are equal, while the number of bureaucrats in the research committee is 75% of the number of bureaucrats in the administration committee.
2. The number of educationalists in the teaching committee is less than the number of educationalists in the research committee. The number of educationalists in the research committee is the average of the numbers of educationalists in the other two committees.
3. 60% of the politicians are in the administration committee, and 20% are in the teaching committee.
 Based on the given information, which of the following statements MUST be FALSE?
 The size of the research committee is less than the size of the administration committee
 In the teaching committee the number of educationalists is equal to the number of politicians
 In the administration committee the number of bureaucrats is equal to the number of educationalists
 The size of the research committee is less than the size of the teaching committee
Total = 24
Bureaucrats are in the ratio 3 : 3 : 4 only value will be 3, 3, 4. So x = 1
Educationalist $n < m < o$ and $ m = \frac { o + n } { 2 }$
Politicians are in ratio 1 : 1 : 3 only value will be 1, 1, 3.
Possible value of m, n, o are 3, 2, 4 and 3, 1, 5.
 What is the number of bureaucrats in the administration committee?
 What is the number of educationalists in the research committee?
 Which of the following CANNOT be determined uniquely based on the given information?
 The total number of educationalists in the three committees
 The total number of bureaucrats in the three committees
 The size of the research committee
 The size of the teaching committee
 Let x, y, z be three positive real numbers in a geometric progression such that x < y < z. If 5x, 16y, and 12z are in an arithmetic progression then the common ratio of the geometric progression is
 3/6
 3/2
 5/2
 1/6
Since x, y ,and z are in G.P. and x<y<z, let x = a, y=ar and z=ar^{2}, where a>0 and r>1.
It is also given that, 15x, 16y and 12z are in A.P.
Therefore, 2×16y=5x+12z
Substituting the values of x, y and z we get,
$32ar=5a + 12ar^2$
$\Rightarrow 32 r=5+12 r^{2}$
$\Rightarrow 12 r^{2}32 r+5=0$
On solving the above quadratic equation we get r=1/6 or 5/2.
Since r>1, therefore r=5/2.
 A tank is fitted with pipes, some filling it and the rest draining it. All filling pipes fill at the same rate, and all draining pipes drain at the same rate. The empty tank gets completely filled in 6 hours when 6 filling and 5 draining pipes are on, but this time becomes 60 hours when 5 filling and 6 draining pipes are on. In how many hours will the empty tank get completely filled when one draining and two filling pipes are on?
Let the rate of each filling pipes be 'x lts/hr' similarly, the rate of each draining pipes be 'y lts/hr'.
As per the first condition,
Capacity of tank = (6x  5y)×6..........(i)
Similarly, from the second condition,
Capacity of tank = (5x  6y) × 60.....(ii)
On equating (i) and (ii), we get
(6x  5y) × 6 = (5x  6y)×60
or, 6x  5y = 50x  60y
or, 44x = 55y
or, 4x = 5y
or, x = 1.25y
Therefore, the capacity of the tank = (6x  5y) × 6 = (7.5y  5y) × 6 = 15y lts
Effective rate of 2 filling pipes and 1 draining pipe = (2x  y) = (2.5y  y) = 1.5y
Hence, the required time = 15y/1.5y=10 hours.
 Given that x^{2018}y^{2017} = 1/2 and x^{2016}y^{2019} = 8, the value of x^{2} + y^{3} is
 35/4
 37/4
 31/4
 33/4
$x^{2018} y^{2017}=\frac{1}{2}$…..(1)
and $x^{2016} y^{2019}=8$…..(2)
Dividing (1) by (2), $\frac{x^{2}}{y^{2}}=\frac{1}{16}$
$\frac{x}{y}=\frac{1}{4}$ i.e. $x=\pm \frac{1}{4} y$
$\left(\pm \frac{1}{4} y\right)^{2018} y^{2017}=\frac{1}{2}$
$y^{4035}=2^{4035}$
$y=2$
Therefore, $x=\pm \frac{1}{4}y=\pm \frac{1}{2}$
Hence, $x^{2}+y^{3}=\frac{1}{4}+8=\frac{33}{4}$
 Point P lies between points A and B such that the length of BP is thrice that of AP. Car 1 starts from A and moves towards B. Simultaneously, car 2 starts from B and moves towards A. Car 2 reaches P one hour after car 1 reaches P. If the speed of car 2 is half that of car 1, then the time, in minutes, taken by car 1 in reaching P from A is
Let the time taken for car 1 to reach P from A be x hours.
Speed of car 1=AP/x
Given BP=3AP
Car 2 starts from B to A and reaches P one hour after car 1 reaches P.
Speed of car $2=\frac{3 \mathrm{AP}}{\mathrm{x}+1}$
Therefore, $\frac{3 \mathrm{AP}}{\mathrm{x}+1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\mathrm{AP}}{\mathrm{x}}\right)$
Or $\mathrm{x}=\frac{1}{5}$ . Time taken for car 1 to reach $\mathrm{P}$ from $\mathrm{A}$ is 12 min.
 If \({\log _2}\left( {5 + {{\log }_3}a} \right) = 3\) and \({\log _5}\left( {4a + 12 + {{\log }_2}b} \right) = 3\), then a + b is equal to
 67
 40
 32
 59
$5+\log _{3} a=2^{3}=8 \Rightarrow a=27$
Similarly, $4 a+12+\log _{2} b=5^{3}=125$
since $a=27,4(27)+12+\log _{2} b=125 \Rightarrow b=32$
a + b = 59.
 A trader sells 10 litres of a mixture of paints A and B, where the amount of B in the mixture does not exceed that of A. The cost of paint A per litre is Rs. 8 more than that of paint B. If the trader sells the entire mixture for Rs. 264 and makes a pro?t of 10%, then the highest possible cost of paint B, in Rs. per litre, is
 26
 16
 20
 22
Let the quantities of the paints A and B in the mixture sold be a litres and b litres respectively.
Value at which the entire mixture is sold=264 Profit percent made=10%
Value at which the entire mixture is bought = $264\times \frac{100}{110}=240$
Price at which the entire mixture is bought=24 per litre Let the cost of B be x per litre.
Cost of A=(x+8)per litre
$\frac{(x+8) a+x b}{10}=24$
Maximum cost of B will occur when a is minimum. b<=a. So, minimum a is 5.
Corresponding b is 5. Then (x+8)(5)+x(5)=240 x=20
 In a circle, two parallel chords on the same side of a diameter have lengths 4 cm and 6 cm. If the distance between these chords is 1 cm, then the radius of the circle, in cm, is
 \(\sqrt {12} \)
 \(\sqrt {14} \)
 \(\sqrt {13} \)
 \(\sqrt {11} \)
Let the 6 cm long chord be x cm away from the centre of the circle. Let the radius of the circle be r cm.
The perpendiculars from the centre of the circle to the chords bisect the chords.
$r^{2}=x^{2}+3^{2}=(x+1)^{2}+2^{2}$
Solving, $x=2$ and $r=\sqrt{13}$
 If among 200 students, 105 like pizza and 134 like burger, then the number of students who like only burger can possibly be
 93
 26
 23
 96
Let the number of students who like both pizza and burger be ‘m’ .
The number of students who like neither of them be n
From venn diagram 105 – m + m + 134 – m + n = 200 m – n = 39
∴The possible values of (m, n) are (39, 0) (40, 1)…….(105, 66)
∴ The number of students who like only burger is lies in the range [134 – 105, 134 – 39] = [29, 95]
∴ From options, 93 is a possible answer
 In an apartment complex, the number of people aged 51 years and above is 30 and there are at most 39 people whose ages are below 51 years. The average age of all the people in the apartment complex is 38 years. What is the largest possible average age, in years, of the people whose ages are below 51 years?
 27
 28
 26
 25
Let the average age of people aged 51 years and above be x years.
Let the average age of people aged below 51 years be y years.
Let the number of people aged below 51 years be N.
Given, the average age of all the people in the apartment complex is 38 years.
Therefore,
$\frac{x\times 30+y\times N}{30+N}=38$ ….(1)
We want to maximize y, which occurs when x is minimum i.e. for x=51.
Substituting the value of x in (1) we get
390=N×(38y)
Again, when y is maximum, N is also maximum i.e. 39
Therefore maximum value of y = 28.
 Given an equilateral triangle T1 with side 24 cm, a second triangle T2 is formed by joining the midpoints of the sides of T1. Then a third triangle T3 is formed by joining the midpoints of the sides of T2. If this process of forming triangles is continued, the sum of the areas, in sq cm, of infinitely many such triangles T1, T2, T3,... will be
 \(164\sqrt 3 \)
 \(188\sqrt 3 \)
 \(248\sqrt 3 \)
 \(192\sqrt 3 \)
Any equilateral triangle formed by joining the midpoints of the sides of another equilateral triangle will have its side equal to half the side of the second equilateral triangle.
Side of T1 = 24 cm Side of T2 = 12 cm Side of T3 = 6 cm and so on.
Sum of the areas of all the triangles
$=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\left(24^{2}+12^{2}+6^{2}+\ldots \ldots\right)$
$=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\left(\frac{576}{1\frac{1}{4}}\right)=192 \sqrt{3}$
 If u^{2} + (u−2v−1)^{2} = −4v(u + v), then what is the value of u + 3v?
 1/4
 0
 1/2
 1/4
$u^{2}+(u2 v1)^{2}=4 v(u+v)$
$\Rightarrow u^{2}+u^{2}+4 v^{2}+14 u v+4 v2 u+4 v u+4 v^{2}=0$
$\Rightarrow 2 u^{2}2 u+8 v^{2}+4 v+1=0$
$\Rightarrow 2\left(u^{2}u+\frac{1}{4}\right)+2\left(4 v^{2}+2 v+\frac{1}{4}\right)=0$
$\Rightarrow 2\left(u\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}+2\left(2 v+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}=0$
$\Rightarrow u\frac{1}{2}=0 ; 2 v+\frac{1}{2}=0$
$\mathrm{u}=\frac{1}{2}$ and $\mathrm{v}=\frac{1}{4}$
$\mathrm{u}+3 \mathrm{v}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}=\frac{1}{4}$
 If x is a positive quantity such that \({2^x} = {3^{{{\log }_5}2}}\) , then x is equal to
 \(1 + {\log _3}\frac{5}{3}\)
 \({\log _5}8\)
 \(1 + {\log _5}\frac{3}{5}\)
 \({\log _5}9\)
Givne that: $2^{x}=3^{\log_{5}{2}}$
$\Rightarrow$ $2^{x}=2^{\log_{5}{3}}$
$\Rightarrow$ $x=\log_{5}{3}$
$\Rightarrow$ $x=\log_{5}{\frac{3*5}{5}}$
$\Rightarrow$ $x=\log_{5}{5}+\log_{5}{\frac{3}{5}}$
$\Rightarrow$ $x=1+\log_{5}{\frac{3}{5}}$.
 While multiplying three real numbers, Ashok took one of the numbers as 73 instead of 37. As a result, the product went up by 720. Then the minimum possible value of the sum of squares of the other two numbers is
Let the other two numbers be y and z.
As per the condition
73yz  37yz = 720
Or 36yz=720
Or yz=20
Minimum possible sum of the squares of the other two numbers would occur when y = z i.e. $y=z=\sqrt{20}$
Hence the required sum = 40.
 Points E, F, G, H lie on the sides AB, BC, CD, and DA, respectively, of a square ABCD. If EFGH is also a square whose area is 62.5% of that of ABCD and CG is longer than EB, then the ratio of length of EB to that of CG is
 2 : 5
 4 : 9
 3 : 8
 1 : 3
Triangles AEH, BFE, CGF and DHG are congruent by ASA.
Let AE = BF = CG = DH = x; EB = FC = DG = AH = 10 xx
$\mathrm{AE}^{2}+\mathrm{AH}^{2}=\mathrm{EH}^{2}$
$\mathrm{x}^{2}+(10\mathrm{x})^{2}=(\sqrt{62.5})^{2}$
Solving, x = 2.5 or 7.5
Since it’s given that CG is longer than EB, CG = 7.5 and EB = 2.5.
Therefore, EB : CG = 1 : 3
 A right circular cone, of height 12 ft, stands on its base which has diameter 8 ft. The tip of the cone is cut off with a plane which is parallel to the base and 9 ft from the base. With π = 22/7, the volume, in cubic ft, of the remaining part of the cone is
We are given that diameter of base = 8 ft. Therefore, the radius of circular base = 8/2 = 4 ft
In triangle OAB and OCD
$\frac{OA}{AB} = \frac{OC}{CD}$
$\Rightarrow$ AB = $\frac{3×4}{12}$ = 1 ft.
Therefore, the volume of remaining part = Volume of entire cone  Volume of smaller cone
$\Rightarrow$ $\frac{1}{3}×\pi×4^2×12\frac{1}{3}×\pi×1^2×3$
$\Rightarrow$ $\frac{1}{3}×\pi×189$
$\Rightarrow$ $\frac{22}{7×3}×189$
$\Rightarrow$ $198$ cubic ft
 \({\log _{12}}81 = p,then\;3\left( {\frac{{4  p}}{{4 + p}}} \right)\) is equal to
 log_{4}16
 log_{6}8
 log_{6}16
 log_{2}8
$\Rightarrow 4 \log _{12} 3=\mathrm{p}$
$\Rightarrow \frac{\mathrm{p}}{4}=\log _{12} 3$
$3\left(\frac{4\mathrm{p}}{4+\mathrm{p}}\right)=3\left(\frac{1\frac{\mathrm{p}}{4}}{1+\frac{\mathrm{p}}{4}}\right)$
$=3\left(\frac{1\log _{12} 3}{1+\log _{12} 3}\right)$
$=3\left(\frac{\log _{12} 12\log _{12} 3}{\log _{12} 12+\log _{12} 3}\right)$
$=3\left(\frac{\log (12 / 3)}{\log (12 / 3)}\right)$
$=3 \frac{\log 4}{\log 36}=3 \log _{36} 4$
$=\log _{6} 8$
 Train T leaves station X for station Y at 3 pm. Train S, traveling at three quarters of the speed of T, leaves Y for X at 4 pm. The two trains pass each other at a station Z, where the distance between X and Z is three?fths of that between X and Y. How many hours does train T take for its journey from X to Y?
Train T starts at 3 PM and train S starts at 4 PM.
Let the speed of train T be t.
=> Speed of train S = 0.75t.
When the trains meet, train t would have traveled for one more hour than train S.
Let us assume that the 2 trains meet x hours after 3 PM. Trains S would have traveled for x1 hours.
Distance traveled by train T = xt
Distance traveled by train S = (x1)*0.75t = 0.75xt0.75t
We know that train T has traveled three fifths of the distance. Therefore, train S should have traveled twofifths the distance between the 2 cities.
=> (xt)/(0.75xt0.75t) = 3/2
2xt = 2.25xt2.25t
0.25x = 2.25
x = 9 hours.
Train T takes 9 hours to cover threefifths the distance. Therefore, to cover the entire distance, train T will take 9*(5/3) = 15 hours.
Therefore, 15 is the correct answer.
 Each of 74 students in a class studies at least one of the three subjects H, E and P. Ten students study all three subjects, while twenty study H and E, but not P. Every student who studies P also studies H or E or both. If the number of students studying H equals that studying E, then the number of students studying H is
Given only P = 0 All three = 10; Studying only H and E but not P = 20
Given number of students studying H = Number of students studying E
= h + x + 20 + 10
= e + y + 20 + 10
h + x = e + y total number of students = 74
Therefore, h + x + 20 + 10 + e + y = 74
h + x + e + y = 44
h + x + h + x = 44
h + x = 22
Therefore, the number of students studying H = h + x + 20 + 10 = 22 + 20 + 10 = 52.
 A wholesaler bought walnuts and peanuts, the price of walnut per kg being thrice that of peanut per kg. He then sold 8 kg of peanuts at a pro?t of 10% and 16 kg of walnuts at a pro?t of 20% to a shopkeeper. However, the shopkeeper lost 5 kg of walnuts and 3 kg of peanuts in transit. He then mixed the remaining nuts and sold the mixture at Rs. 166 per kg, thus making an overall pro?t of 25%. At what price, in Rs. per kg, did the wholesaler buy the walnuts?
 98
 96
 84
 86
Cost price of walnuts for the wholesaler is 3x per kg.
The wholesaler sold 8 kg of peanuts at 10% profit and 16 kg of walnuts at 20% profit to a shopkeeper.
Total cost price to the shopkeeper = (8)(x)(1.1) + 16(3x)(1.2) = 66.4x
The shopkeeper lost 5 kg walnuts and 3 kg peanuts.
The shopkeeper sold the mixture of 11 kg walnuts and 5 kg peanuts.
His total selling price=166(16) = 2656
His total cost price $=2656\left(\frac{100}{125}\right)=2124.8$
$66.4 x=2124.8$
$x=32$
Price at which the wholesaler bought walnuts = 3x = 96/ per kg
 A CAT aspirant appears for a certain number of tests. His average score increases by 1 if the first 10 tests are not considered, and decreases by 1 if the last 10 tests are not considered. If his average scores for the first 10 and the last 10 tests are 20 and 30, respectively, then the total number of tests taken by him is
The aspirant's average score for the first 10 tests and last 10 tests are 20 and 30 respectively.
$\frac{nx200}{n10}=x+1$ and $\frac{nx300}{n10}=x1$
Solving, we get n=60
 Raju and Lalitha originally had marbles in the ratio 4:9. Then Lalitha gave some of her marbles to Raju. As a result, the ratio of the number of marbles with Raju to that with Lalitha became 5:6. What fraction of her original number of marbles was given by Lalitha to Raju?
 1/4
 7/33
 1/5
 6/19
Let the number of marbles that Lalitha gave to Raju be y.
It has been given that (4x+y)/(9xy) = 5/6
24x + 6y = 45x – 5y
11y = 21x
y/x = 21/11
Fraction of original marbles given to Raju by Lalitha = y/9x (As Lalitha had 9x marbles initially).
y/9x = 21/99
= 7/33.
 Let ABCD be a rectangle inscribed in a circle of radius 13 cm. Which one of the following pairs can represent, in cm, the possible length and breadth of ABCD?
 24, 10
 25, 9
 24, 12
 25, 10
We know that AC is the diameter and $\angle$ ABC = 90°. AC = 2*13 = 26 cm
In right angle triangle ABC,
$AC^2 = AB^2 + BC^2$
$\Rightarrow$ $AB^2+BC^2=26^2$
$\Rightarrow$ $AB^2+BC^2=676$
Let us check with the options.
Option (A): $24^2+10^2 = 676$.
Option (B): $25^2+9^2 = 706 \neq 676$.
Option (C): $25^2+10^2 = 725 \neq 676$.
Option (D): $24^2+12^2 = 720 \neq 676$.
 In a parallelogram ABCD of area 72 sq cm, the sides CD and AD have lengths 9 cm and 16 cm, respectively. Let P be a point on CD such that AP is perpendicular to CD. Then the area, in sq cm, of triangle APD is
 18√3
 24√3
 32√3
 12√3
Area of the parallelogram ABCD = (base)(height) = (CD)(AP) = 72 sq.cm.
(CD)(AP) = 72 9(AP) = 72 => AP = 8
$D P=\sqrt{A D^{2}A P^{2}}=\sqrt{16^{2}8^{2}}=8 \sqrt{3}$
Area of triangle $A P D=\frac{1}{2}(A P)(P D)=32 \sqrt{3}$
 In a circle with center O and radius 1 cm, an arc AB makes an angle 60 degrees at O. Let R be the region bounded by the radii OA, OB and the arc AB. If C and D are two points on OA and OB, respectively, such that OC = OD and the area of triangle OCD is half that of R, then the length of OC, in cm, is
 \({\left( {\frac{\pi }{{3\sqrt 3 }}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\)
 \({\left( {\frac{\pi }{4}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\)
 \({\left( {\frac{\pi }{6}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\)
 \({\left( {\frac{\pi }{{4\sqrt 3 }}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\)
Chord AB subtends an angle of 60° on the centre of the given circle. R be the region bounded by the radii OA, OB and the arc AB.
Therefore, R = $\frac{60°}{360°}$×Area of the circle = $\frac{1}{6}$×$\pi×(1)^2$ = $\frac{\pi}{6}$ sq. cm
It is given that OC = OD and area of triangle OCD is half that of R. Let OC = OD = x.
Area of triangle COD = $\frac{1}{2}×OC×OD×sin60°$
$\frac{\pi}{6×2}$ = $\frac{1}{2}×x×x×\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$
$\Rightarrow$ $x^2 = \frac{\pi}{3\sqrt{3}}$
$\Rightarrow$ $x$ = $(\frac{\pi}{3\sqrt{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}}$ cm.
 How many numbers with two or more digits can be formed with the digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, so that in every such number, each digit is used at most once and the digits appear in the ascending order?
Number of possible twodigit numbers which can be formed = $^{9} \mathrm{C}_{2}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{3}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{4}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{5}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{6}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{7}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{8}+^{9} \mathrm{C}_{9}$
$={{2}^{9}}\left( ^{9}{{\text{C}}_{1}}{{+}^{9}}{{\text{C}}_{1}} \right)$
$=512(1+9)=502$
 The number of integers x such that 0.25 < 2^{x} < 200, and 2^{x} +2 is perfectly divisible by either 3 or 4, is
Possible values of x satisfying the above inequality are –2, –1,0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
When x = 0, 1, 2, 4 and 6, $2^{x} + 2$ is divisible by 3 or 4.
The number of values of x is 5
 If f(x + 2) = f(x) + f(x + 1) for all positive integers x, and f(11) = 91, f(15) = 617, then f(10) equals
f(11) = 91
Let f(12) = a
f(13) = 91 + a
f(14) = 91 + 2a
f(15) = 182 + 3a.
This is also equal to 617.
182 + 3a = 617 => a = 145
f(10) = f(12)  f(11) = 145  91 = 54
 In an examination, the maximum possible score is N while the pass mark is 45% of N. A candidate obtains 36 marks, but falls short of the pass mark by 68%. Which one of the following is then correct?
 N ≤ 200.
 243 ≤ N ≤ 252.
 N ≥ 253.
 201 ≤ N ≤ 242.
Maximum possible score is N.
Pass mark is 45% of N. 32% of 45% of N = 36 => N = 250
 Two types of tea, A and B, are mixed and then sold at Rs. 40 per kg. The profit is 10% if A and B are mixed in the ratio 3 : 2, and 5% if this ratio is 2 : 3. The cost prices, per kg, of A and B are in the ratio
 18 : 25
 19 : 24
 21 : 25
 17 : 25
The selling price of the mixture is Rs.40/kg.
Let a be the quantity of tea A in the mixture and b be the quantity of tea B in the mixture.
It has been given that the profit is 10% if the 2 varieties are mixed in the ratio 3:2
Let the cost price of the mixture be x.
It has been given that 1.1x = 40
x = 40/1.1
$\frac{3a+2b}{5} = \frac{40}{1.1}$
$3.3a+2.2b=200$ (1)
The profit is 5% if the 2 varieties are mixed in the ratio 2:3.
$\frac{2a+3b}{5} = \frac{40}{1.05}$
$2.1a+3.15b=200$ (2)
Equating (1) and (2), we get,
$3.3a+2.2b = 2.1a+3.15b$
$1.2a=0.95b$
$\frac{a}{b} = \frac{0.95}{1.2}$
$\frac{a}{b} = \frac{19}{24}$
 John borrowed Rs. 2,10,000 from a bank at an interest rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually. The loan was repaid in two equal instalments, the first after one year and the second after another year. The ?rst instalment was interest of one year plus part of the principal amount, while the second was the rest of the principal amount plus due interest thereon. Then each instalment, in Rs., is
$\frac{x}{1.1}+\frac{x}{1.1^{2}}=210000$
x=121000
 Let f(x) = min{2x^{2},52−5x}, where x is any positive real number. Then the maximum possible value of f(x) is
f(x) = min (${2x^{2},525x}$)
The maximum possible value of this function will be attained when $2x^{2}=525x$.
$2x^2+5x52=0$
$(2x+13)(x4)=0$
=> $x=\frac{13}{2}$ or $x = 4$
Since x has to be positive integer, we can discard the case $x=\frac{13}{2}$.
$x=4$ is the point at which the function attains the maximum value.
putting $x=4$ in the original function, we get, $2x^2 = 2*4^2= 32$.
Or the maximum value of f(x) = $32$.
 The distance from A to B is 60 km. Partha and Narayan start from A at the same time and move towards B. Partha takes four hours more than Narayan to reach B. Moreover, Partha reaches the midpoint of A and B two hours before Narayan reaches B. The speed of Partha, in km per hour, is
 4
 6
 5
 3
Let the time taken by Partha to cover 60 km be x hours.
As per the condition, Narayan will cover 60 km in x4 hours.
Therefore, Speed of Partha = $\frac{60}{x}$
And Speed of Narayan = $\frac{60}{x4}$
It is also given that Partha reaches the midpoint of A and B two hours before Narayan reaches B. Hence,
=> $\frac{30}{\frac{60}{x}} + 2 = \frac{60}{\frac{60}{(x4)}}$
$\frac{x}{2} + 2 = x4$
$\frac{x+4}{2}=x4$
$x+4=2x8$
$x=12$
OR Partha will take 12 hours to cross 60 km.
=> Speed of Partha = $\frac{60}{12}=5$ Kmph.
 Humans and robots can both perform a job but at different efficiencies. Fifteen humans and five robots working together take thirty days to finish the job, whereas five humans and fifteen robots working together take sixty days to finish it. How many days will fifteen humans working together (without any robot) take to finish it?
 36
 32
 45
 40
$15 \mathrm{H}+5 \mathrm{R}=\frac{1}{30}$ …… (1)
$5 \mathrm{H}+15 \mathrm{R}=\frac{1}{60}$ ……(2)
$3(1)(2)=>40 \mathrm{H}=\frac{1}{12}$
$\mathrm{H}=\frac{1}{480}$
In a day, 15 humans can complete 15H i.e. $\frac{1}{32} t h$ of the job.
15 humans can complete the job in 32 days
 When they work alone, B needs 25% more time to finish a job than A does. They two finish the job in 13 days in the following manner: A works alone till half the job is done, then A and B work together for four days, and finally B works alone to complete the remaining 5% of the job. In how many days can B alone finish the entire job?
 20
 16
 22
 18
Time taken by B to finish the job $=\frac{5}{4} a$ days.
Part of the job completed when A and B worked together for 4 days = $1=\frac{1}{2}\frac{5}{100}=\frac{9}{20}$
$4\left(\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{\frac{5 a}{4}}\right)=\frac{9}{20} \Rightarrow a=16$
Time taken by B alone to complete the entire job = 5a/4 = 20 days.