Six players – Tanzi, Umeza, Wangdu, Xyla, Yonita and Zeneca competed in an archery tournament. The tournament had three compulsory rounds, Rounds 1 to 3. In each round every player shot an arrow at a target. Hitting the centre of the target (called bull’s eye) fetched the highest score of 5. The only other possible scores that a player could achieve were 4, 3, 2 and 1. Every bull’s eye score in the first three rounds gave a player one additional chance to shoot in the bonus rounds, Rounds 4 to 6. The possible scores in Rounds 4 to 6 were identical to the first three.
A player’s total score in the tournament was the sum of his/her scores in all rounds played by him/her. The table below presents partial information on points scored by the players after completion of the tournament. In the table, NP means that the player did not participate in that round, while a hyphen means that the player participated in that round and the score information is missing.
The following facts are also known.
- Tanzi, Umeza and Yonita had the same total score.
- Total scores for all players, except one, were in multiples of three.
- The highest total score was one more than double of the lowest total score.
- The number of players hitting bull’s eye in Round 2 was double of that in Round 3.
- Tanzi and Zeneca had the same score in Round 1 but different scores in Round 3.
What was the highest total score?
What was Zeneca's total score?
Which of the following statements is true?
- Zeneca’s score was 23.
- Xyla was the highest scorer.
- Zeneca was the highest scorer.
- Xyla’s score was 23.
What was Tanzi's score in Round 3?
Since Tanzi played another round, he/she must have scored 5 in either Round 1 or Round 3. In the other round, let us say that Tanzi scored x. So Tanzi’s total score would be 14 + x.
Umeza played Round 4 and Round 5. This means Umeza scored 5 in two of the first three rounds. In the remaining round, let Umezas score be y. Umeza's total score would be 13 + y.
Since the total score was not a multiple of 3 for only one person and Tanzi, Umeza and Yonita had the same total score, both 14 + x and 13 + y should be multiples of 3.
14 + x will be a multiple of 3 if x = 1 or 4. In that case the total score will be 15 or 18.
13 + y will be a multiple of 3 if y = 2 or 5. But if y = 5. then Umeza would have played Round 6 but that did not
happen. Therefore, y = 2 and x = 1. The total score of Umeza. Tanzi and Yonita is 15.
Since Wangdu did not play any round after Round 3, the maximum score that Wangdu can get is 12 when he
scores 4 in both Round 1 and Round 3.
Since Xyla played all the rounds, Xyla must have scored 5 in each of the first three rounds. So Xyla's minimum total score is 22, if Xyla scored 1 in Round 6.
Zeneca played Round 4 and Round 5. So Zeneca must have scored 5 in two of the first three rounds. So Zeneca's minimum and maximum total scores are 21 and 24 respectively. Therefore, Wangdu had the lowest score.
If Wangdu scored 12. then the highest score would be 25. Only Xyla can score 25 (5 in the first three rounds and 4 in Round 6).
If Wangdu scored 11. then the highest score would be 23. This is not possible because there will be two total scores that are not multiples of 3.
If Wangdu scored 10. then the highest score would be 21. But we know that Xyla's minimum score is 22. Therefore, this is not possible.
Any score of Wangdu less than 10 would mean the highest score is less than 20 but we know that Xyla's minimum score is 22. Therefore, Wangdu scored 12 and Xyla scored 25. This implies Wangdu scored 4 in each of Round 1 and Round 3 and Xyla scored 4 in Round 6.
Xyla's total score is not a multiple of 3. Hence. Zeneca's total score must be a multiple of 3. Zeneca would have scored 21 or 24.
Tanzi and Zeneca scored the same in Round 1. Tanzi's score in Round 1 is either 1 or 5. If Tanzi scored 1 in Round 1, then Zeneca would also have scored 1 in Round 1. But in this case, both Zeneca and Tanzi would have scored 5 in Round 3. But it is given that their scores in Round 3 are different. Therefore. Tanzi scored 5 in Round 1 and 1 in Round 3.
The number of players hitting bull s eye in Round 2 is either 2 or 4. If it is 2, then the total number of 5s in Round 2 and Round 3 combined should be 3. Two of those 5s were scored by Xyla. Umeza and Zeneca would each have scored at least one 5 in Rounds 2 and 3 combined but in this case, the number of 5s in Round 2 and 3 combined would be at least 4. which is not possible. Therefore, the number of players hitting bull's eye in Round 2 are 4. Since Tanzi and Wangdu scored 4 in Round 2, all the other players would have hit bull's eye in Round 2. This means that the number of players hitting bull’s eye in Round 3 are 2. Xyla is one of them and the other one has to be either Umeza or Zeneca. But if Zeneca had scored 5 in Round 3. then Zeneca would have played Round 6, which Zeneca didn't. Therefore, Umeza is the other person who scored 5 in Round 3.
Since Umeza s total score is 15, Umeza scored 2 in Round 1.
Since Yonita’s total score is 15, Yonita scored 2 in Round 1.
Zeneca s total score cannot be 21 because in that case, both Zeneca and Tanzi would have scored the same in Round 3, but they had different scores.
Therefore. Zeneca scored 4 in Round 3.
The highest total score was 25.
Zeneca's total score was 24.
Question 3:The statement, “Xyla was the highest scorer”, is true.
Question 4:Tanzi’s score in Round 3 was 1
CAT 2019 LRDI setsCAT 2019 LRDI set 1
CAT 2019 LRDI set 2
CAT 2019 LRDI set 3
CAT 2019 LRDI set 4 [Current page]
CAT 2019 LRDI set 5
CAT 2019 LRDI set 6
CAT 2019 LRDI set 7
CAT 2019 LRDI set 8
CAT 2019 LRDI set 9
CAT 2019 LRDI set 10
CAT 2019 LRDI set 11
CAT 2019 LRDI set 12
CAT 2019 LRDI set 13
CAT 2019 LRDI set 14
CAT 2019 LRDI set 15
CAT 2019 LRDI set 16